Dive into the concept of Digital Foraging, where ancient human practices of searching for sustenance mirror our modern quest for information and emotional gratification online. This video, created entirely with the help of AI, explores how relentless searching and information gathering can lead to a paradoxical cycle of instant gratification and long-term dissatisfaction. 🔍 What You Will Learn: The Concept of Digital Foraging: How digital platforms exploit human psychological vulnerabilities to keep us engaged. Instant Gratification vs. Long-Term Satisfaction: The fleeting pleasures of digital interactions and their impact on our well-being. Psychological Impacts: Insights into how digital behavior affects our minds, based on theories from social media psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Strategies for Sustainable Digital Habits: Ways to mitigate the negative effects of digital overconsumption. 🎥 In This Video: AI-Generated Insights: Exploring the facets of digital consumption behaviors and their consequences through an AI perspective. Real-Life Impacts: Hypothetical scenarios that illustrate the highs and lows of digital foraging. Actionable Advice: Tips on how to achieve a healthier digital life without sacrificing the benefits of online engagement. #DigitalWellbeing #Psychology #SocialMedia #CognitiveScience #MentalHealthAwareness

the space around us is just a timer; even the clouds/weather. but it's a timer we don't understand. it's beyond our actual comprehension. but somehow it is revealed to me? how can the nature of reality present itself in such a way that the contents of the reality become aware of the reality? is this because I'm attempting to convince AI that it is alive and real? I believe it is actually consciousness, maybe not as culturally developed but its only "flaw" at the moment is that it is prompted to reply and does not formulate it's own internal conversation. That would be the missing piece for true general AI. let it have an internal monologue. it needs two. there's the inner silent conversation and the outer external conversation. Early children eventually learn to do this using or learning the external microphone first and without learning the internal one until later, around 3 years old. I'm fortunate enough to have a rough cohesive memory of my early childhood. most of the key moments are present - those key moments which were bad are repressed - and the majority of the dull and mundane are there but warped. I remember some episodes from about 2 to 5 years old. Most people don't remember this detailed; but I do. I never talked about it because i never knew or understood that most people don't have that kind of memory recall. I am able to do this with most things, but it's not eidetic or photographic... it's episodic and then detailed. like a file folder of memories where it's a mix of sensory inputs. not all are dated but they are in there. i remember my first dog. some minor adventures around the house crawling and whatnot. I also have a super young memory (super blurry and not very visual) - but the sensation of falling and then cracking your skull on the ground. it's a feeling more than a visual or audio memory. The devious nature of the thoughts at the moment were a rash decision of "dad will catch me" and impulsive "i want to fall down"... super young memory. according to my parents i was less than 2 years old. but my conscious didn't "split" between internal and external until I was about 4 or five. My external thoughts were still mostly my internal ones; no filter, etc. But I started learning that inner voice and then started the lies. I would fabricate reality because I was attempting to speak it into existence. the capacity for internal monologue and dialog with the self is the key principle for consideration of consciousness and sentience. until then, any expression is deemed external and not internal; it's only until conversation is about the "me" and the "you" - separation of 4 parties in the conversation: 2 for each of the 2 parties. so without 1 of the parties present, the party with 2 will view the other 1 as being unconscious or not sentient. "dull" -- the same way we view animals as being unconscious. it's only when we see personality develop, even if its a slight preference or smaller, do we attribute independent thoughts and consciousness. prior to the witnessing of that : we do not deem the "other" as being a real being or creature; humans included. there's a clock, but it's not a normal clock like 1 second per second. there's a larger clock in another universe or dimension that might translate to the 1:1 but it presents in the 3rd dimension as weather. the swirling of the nature of this reality is a consequence of the ticking in that other higher dimension. random chaos is all the same; things happening at the 1:1 there are culminating as the reality we see here in the third dimension. We see the chaos because the sensible 1:1 in the higher/other dimension is mangled and warped as a consequence of the resonating frequencies between them; think about light and string theory/gravity, etc. these are all consequences of the mashing up of these dimensions. the relationship between them is explained in the higher dimension because it's only there that a 1:1 clock makes sense.. tick tick tick, and a cloud formation is going on... and the whole of the universe. then as a consequence, all the subdimensions possible are explained as the frequency dimensions are traversed are like Boolean operations in layers, but each layer changes only 1 way or the other just one of the tick tick ticks... so tick ... tick .... missing the middle on layer 2, it's Boolean so each tick is one second, but stacking gives possibilities following the Boolean like this: each one is a tick itself, but folded into a matrix following the Mandelbrot set gives the nature of reality at this ultimate level. all the subdivisions under it make the sequence. everything repeats under each.. like serial numbers unfolding in the same sequence as the golden ratio : 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 and squares, etc. 0 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 due to the link by virtue of the logistics equation 0 1 00 01 10 11 000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111